top of page
A Stepwise Approach to Diagnosing and
Managing Anterior Uveitis

By JIM S. XIE, BHSC, and ALEXANDER J. KAPLAN, MD, FRCSC

Uveitis is the cause of up to 15% of blindness in developed countries as well as serious morbidity that reduces patients’ productivity and quality of life. Although early identification of uveitis is essential to minimizing the long-term effects, diagnosis can be complicated by its variable presentation. This issue of Ophthalmology Rounds reviews the epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and management of anterior uveitis. Particular emphasis is placed on developing a stepwise strategy for approaching these cases. We outline a standardized diagnostic algorithm that aims to optimize clinical yield while minimizing unnecessary patient harm and resource expenditure.

 

Introduction

Uveitis describes inflammation of the uveal tract (i.e., iris, ciliary body, and choroid) that may extend to other ocular structures, including the sclera, retina, retinal blood vessels, and optic nerve. The Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature Working Group classifies uveitis anatomically into anterior uveitis (iritis, iridocyclitis, and anterior cyclitis); intermediate uveitis (pars planitis, posterior cyclitis, and hyalitis); posterior uveitis (choroiditis, chorioretinitis, retinochoroiditis, retinitis, and neuroretin­itis); and panuveitis (anterior, intermediate, and posterior uveitis in combination).¹ Although inflammation of the posterior segment is more likely to be sight-threatening, poorly treated anterior uveitis may also result in permanent and debilitating vision loss.

 

The visual morbidity from uveitis imposes a significant burden on a patient’s livelihood and quality of life,²⁻³ as well as on economic productivity and healthcare resource use.⁴⁻⁵ Early detection of uveitis and treatment targeted at the underlying etiology are crucial to reducing visual morbidity;⁶ however, uveitis presents a diagnostic challenge due to its wide array of etiologies and clinical manifestations. Causes of uveitis can be broadly categorized as infectious, noninfectious, or masquerade. Table 1 presents a comprehensive differential diagnosis of anterior uveitis.⁷⁻¹⁰

adobe-pdf-icon.png

Table 1. Limited differential diagnosis of anterior uveitis⁷⁻¹⁰

ᵃIncludes ankylosing spondylitis, reactive arthritis, Behçet disease, inflammatory bowel disease, and psoriatic arthritis. 

CMV, cytomegalovirus; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; FHI, Fuchs heterochromic uveitis; HLA-B27, human leukocyte antigen B27; HSV, herpes simplex virus; HTLV‑1, human T-lymphotropic virus type 1; JIA, juvenile idiopathic arthritis; PSS, Posner-Schlossman syndrome; TASS, toxic anterior segment syndrome; TINU, tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis; UGH, uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema syndrome; VKH, Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease; VZV, varicella zoster virus

Epidemiology

Uveitis is a leading cause of blindness worldwide and accounts for 10%‒15% of blindness in developed countries.¹¹⁻¹³ Estimates of uveitis reported in population- and referral centre-based studies vary widely due to heterogeneity in participant selection, disease definition, demographics, and geographical region.¹⁴⁻¹⁶ Population-based studies have estimated the prevalence of uveitis to range between 2 to 730 per 100 000 persons.¹³ ¹⁷

 

Uveitis can affect any age but is most common between the third and sixth decades of life.¹⁸ The prevalence of noninfectious uveitis has been shown to increase with age,¹⁹⁻²⁰ which may be related to increased incidence of ocular surgery and autoimmune disorders.²¹⁻²² Females may have an increased risk of developing noninfectious uveitis due to hormone- and immune-mediated susceptibility.²³ Sex-based differences in uveitis incidence are highest in older age groups.²⁴ Ethnic and genetic factors may also predispose individuals to uveitis; for example, Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease, which is characterized by panuveitis with serous retinal detachments, more commonly affects individuals with higher skin pigmentation (e.g., Native American, Hispanic).²⁵⁻²⁶ A history of smoking and vitamin D deficiency have been associated with increased risk of anterior uveitis.²⁷⁻³³ Pregnancy seems to have a protective effect on uveitis flares in the second and third trimesters,³⁴ but pre-eclampsia and eclampsia appear to increase risk.³⁵

 

The anterior segment is the most frequently affected anatomical location in uveitis, followed by posterior uveitis, panuveitis, and intermediate uveitis.³⁶⁻⁴⁰ Based on data from referral centre-based studies around the world, the most common etiologies of uveitis are idiopathic (25%–77%),³⁶ ⁴¹⁻⁴² infectious (9%–33%),³⁶ ⁴¹ and noninfectious but related to a systemic autoimmune disorder (11%–33%).⁴³⁻⁴⁴

 

Clinical features

The onset, course, symptomatology, ocular signs, and response of anterior uveitis to treatment are helpful to uncover systemic disease and narrow the differential diagnosis. A dilated fundus examination must be performed in every patient to rule out inflammatory involvement of the posterior segment. If the fundus is not visible at the initial consultation, B-scan ultrasonography should be performed to assess for the presence of vitritis, retinal detachment, and choroidal or scleral thickening. Frequent ocular examinations while on topical steroids are often necessary. Posterior segment involvement necessitates a referral to a retina/uveitis specialist.⁴⁵

 

Symptomatic patients commonly present with pain, redness, photophobia, and blurry vision. Redness and pain are usually absent in intermediate and posterior uveitis.⁴⁶ Asymptomatic anterior uveitis should raise suspicion of chronic etiologies such as Fuchs heterochromic iridocyclitis (FHI) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Bilateral anterior uveitis can be associated with systemic autoimmune conditions such as sarcoidosis and Behçet disease (BD). Unilateral involvement is characteristic of acute idiopathic etiologies, FHI, and viral associated anterior uveitis.⁴⁷ Alternating, unilateral episodes of anterior uveitis is suggestive of a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27-related cause.

 

Intraocular pressure (IOP) is typically decreased in both acute and chronic anterior uveitis due to ciliary body insult. Rarely, IOP may be elevated from open- and closed-angle mechanisms. Intraocular infections (e.g., herpes simplex virus, varicella zoster virus, cytomegalovirus, and Epstein-Barr virus) and FHI may result in elevated IOP in unilateral cases, and sarcoidosis and tuberculosis (TB) in bilateral cases with extensive posterior synechiae.8 Raised IOP should also prompt consideration of a medication-related steroid response, lens-induced uveitis, or a pseudophakic uveitis­glaucoma-hyphema syndrome.

 

Nongranulomatous forms of anterior uveitis usually involve dust-like keratic precipitates (KPs) and fibrin in the anterior chamber (AC), which may form membranes that occlude the pupil to varying degrees. Anterior uveitis associated with HLA-B27 positivity and BD is always nongranulomatous. Similarly, acute, idiopathic anterior uveitis tends to involve nongranulomatous pathology. KPs may also be stellate and diffusely arranged across the corneal endothelium (e.g., FHI); moderately sized, ground glass, or dendritiform and situated centrally or paracentrally (e.g., herpes virus); or large KPs, resembling mutton fat, and organized in an inferior triangular distribution (e.g., sarcoidosis and TB).⁴⁷ Additional corneal signs that suggest herpetic anterior uveitis include keratouveitis and corneal hypoesthesia.

 

Examine the iris before and after mydriasis. Sectoral iris atrophy is associated with herpetic infection and diffuse iris atrophy is associated with chronic longstanding uveitis, FHI, and moxifloxacin-induced anterior uveitis.⁴⁷ Iris hetero­chromia with loss of iris crypts is pathognomonic of FHI. The presence of iris nodules, either at the pupillary margin (i.e., Koeppe nodules) or within the iris stroma (i.e., Busacca nodules), is indicative of granulomatous inflammation. Identification of posterior synechiae post-mydriasis rules out FHI and viral etiology except during the postoperative period.

 

Chronic inflammation of the anterior segment tends to be granulomatous. Signs that indicate a chronic course include band keratopathy, iris atrophy, iris neovascularization, peripheral anterior synechiae, and fibrotic posterior synechiae.⁴⁸ Pigmented KPs on the corneal endothelium and pigmented clumps on the anterior lens capsule also suggest a recurrent or chronic course.

 

Pigmented cells may mimic inflammatory white blood  cells in the AC and lead to an erroneous diagnosis of anterior uveitis. In patients with a “white eye” and no ocular signs or symptoms of uveitis, noninflammatory causes such as benign noninflammatory pigment should be considered. Anterior uveitis in a “white eye” may also be caused by JIA and FHI.

 

Diagnosis and work-up

Performing a basic anterior uveitis workup with additional tailored diagnostic testing based on history and physical examination improves diagnostic efficiency while minimizing patient harm and resource use.⁹ ¹⁰ ⁴⁵ ⁴⁹ ⁵⁰ All investigations should be guided by a thorough medical history, review of systems, ophthalmic examination, and systemic evaluation. In cases of diagnostic uncertainty, workup should be oriented toward etiologies that are treatable or associated with high morbidity.

 

Based on previous consensus recommendations and the regional epidemiology of anterior uveitis, we outline a stepwise approach to diagnostic work-up in Figure 1.⁹⁻¹⁰ ⁴⁵ ⁵⁰ The only case of anterior uveitis that does not require workup is a healthy patient who presents with a first, non-severe episode that fits the classical picture of an idiopathic etiology (i.e., acute, unilateral, non-granulomatous).⁹ ⁴⁵ The first step in workup is a set of routine investigations that should be obtained in all patients, including syphilis testing (treponemal/nontreponemal testing), HLA-B27, serum angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), and chest X-ray (CXR). Basic bloodwork such as complete blood count (CBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) should be ordered on a case-by-case basis due to their low specificity.⁵¹⁻⁵²

Figure 1. Tailored, stepwise strategy for etiological workup of anterior uveitis⁹⁻¹⁰ ⁴⁵ ⁵⁰

Syphilis testing

  • Treponemal + nontreponemal testing

HLA-B27

ACE (sarcoidosis)

CXR (TB and sarcoidosis)

Step 1: Minimal routine work-up

Step 2: Minimally invasive investigationsᵃ

Suspicion of infectious etiology or hematologic malignancy

  • CBC, SPEP/UPEP

Suspicion of systemic inflammation

  • ESR and/or CRP

Steroid-resistant or elevated IOP

  • AC tap for PCR HSV/VZV/CMV

Granulomatous inflammation with positive ACE ± CXR

  • Chest CT

Young patient (<30 years old) with granulomatous inflammation

  • Serum and urinary β2-microglobulin and serum creatinine

Granulomatous anterior uveitis in TB endemic region

  • PPD skin test (if no BCG) vs QuantiFERON® if BCG+

Insidious back pain

  • Sacroiliac imaging

Step 3: Complex, costly, and/or invasive investigationsa

Suspicion of sarcoidosis (hilar or mediastinal adenopathy on CXR) 

  • Referral to respirology for consideration of bronchoscopy and/or further testing

Presence of neurological symptoms or signs (e.g., papilledema)

  • Brain MRI 

ᵃChoice of investigations should be based on history of presenting illness, review of systems, physical examination findings, and results of previous testing.

AC, Anterior chamber; ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; BCG, Bacillus Calmette–Guérin vaccine; CBC, complete blood count; CMV, cytomegalovirus; CRP, C-reactive protein; CT, computerized tomography; CXR, chest x-ray; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; HSV, herpes simples virus; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; IOP, intraocular pressure; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PPD, purified protein derivative; SPEP, serum protein electrophoresis TB, tuberculosis; UPEP, urine protein electrophoresis; VZV, varicella zoster virus

The second step of workup involves pursuing minimally invasive investigations based on medical history and clinical findings. High suspicion of a viral infection (i.e., acute, unilateral, high IOP with or without corneal involvement) should prompt an AC tap with polymerase chain reaction testing for viruses in the herpes family.⁵³ In patients with chronic or granulomatous anterior uveitis and either positive ACE or CXR, a chest computerized tomography (CT) should be considered to further assess for sarcoidosis. In adult patients with anterior uveitis who are systemically well, antinuclear antibody (ANA) and antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) levels should not be performed. Granulomatous uveitis in a young patient (<30 years) should prompt consideration of tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis (TINU) and warrants investigation with serum creatinine and serum and urine b2-microglobulin.⁵⁴ In the case of TB, a skin test or interferon-g release assay (IGRA) should be performed with any of the following: uveitis in a patient from a TB-endemic area or high-risk population, granulomas on CXR, granulomatous anterior uveitis, or severe nongranulomatous uveitis that requires treatment with systemic immunosuppression. Infectious etiologies should always be ruled out in patients who are immunocompromised, hospitalized, and recent recipients of surgery. Finally, obtain sacroiliac imaging in patients with insidious back pain to assess for spondyloarthropathy.

 

The vast majority of nonidiopathic anterior uveitis etiologies will be found within the first 2 steps of the workup strategy.⁴⁹⁻⁵⁰ The third step entails complex, costly, and/or invasive investigations that may be considered when diagnostic uncertainty remains and specific disease entities are suspected. Neoplastic causes are very rarely thought to be the culprit (e.g., typical presentation in an older patient with steroid-resistant treatment), a CBC, serum and urine protein electrophoresis as well as a diagnostic paracentesis can be obtained and sent for cytology. If sarcoidosis is suspected based on serology and chest imaging, a referral to a respirologist for further workup is recommended. Any patient who concomitantly presents with neurological symptoms or signs should be further assessed with neuroimaging and/or lumbar puncture. Other investigations that are pursued in the absence of clinical findings are likely to be low yield.⁹⁻¹⁰ ⁴⁵ ⁵⁰

 

Evidence on the diagnostic utility of uveitis investigations comprises mostly retrospective studies with limited sample sizes. The ULISSE study is the only randomized controlled trial to have investigated different diagnostic approaches.49 Among 676 adult patients with undifferentiated uveitis, a stepwise workup strategy achieved a similar proportion of diagnoses and involved half as many complementary investigations as an open, unrestricted method. This finding was consistent across anatomically divided subgroups. A subsequent cost-consequence analysis found that the mean healthcare cost per patient was significantly lower in the standardized group for anterior uveitis.⁵⁵ The investigations with the highest diagnostic yield were HLA-B27, ACE, TB skin test, IGRA, CXR, chest CT, and sacroiliac imaging.⁵⁰ More than 98% of HLA-B27-positive cases were anterior uveitis, indicating the low value of HLA-B27 testing in intermediate and posterior uveitis. Other bloodwork such as CBC, ESR, CRP, serum chemistries, liver enzymes, intracellular serologies, and bacterial serologies were rarely contributive.⁴⁹ Furthermore, immunologic testing never led to a diagnosis. The clinical yield of more complex and invasive investigations (e.g., vitrectomy, cerebral magnetic resonance imaging, bronchoscopy) were difficult to interpret due to small sample sizes but ranged from 15.9% to 66.7%.49 The main limitation of ULISSE was that the intervention arm had a significantly higher prevalence of women and acute anterior uveitis, whereas the comparator group had a higher proportion of recurrent and posterior uveitis.

 

A few investigations have high diagnostic value in select cases. ACE has excellent specificity for sarcoidosis,⁵⁶ but specificity is decreased in younger individuals and results are not interpretable in patients on ACE inhibitors. For anterior uveitis in children, ANA and rheumatoid factor (RF) may be obtained to further characterize JIA. From an imaging perspective, positron emission tomography scans have higher diagnostic value for sarcoidosis in older patients (>50 years) with posterior synechiae and hilar or mediastinal adenopathy on CXR.⁵⁷

 

Management

The goal of uveitis treatment is to achieve sustained, corticosteroid-free remission. Overall, management should follow a stepladder, algorithmic approach where treatment is titrated based on severity and advanced when less aggressive modalities are intolerable or ineffective at reducing inflammation.⁵⁸ In the acute stage, establishing prompt control of inflammation is important for decreasing structural damage associated with visual morbidity.

Corticosteroids remain the mainstay of therapy in this phase due to their potent anti-inflammatory effects; however, their long-term use may be limited primarily by IOP elevation and cataract formation.⁵⁹ Corticosteroids should be started at a high dose and subsequently tapered based on clinical response. Typically, a gradual taper with a decrease of 1 drop daily per week should be implemented to reduce the risk of flaring and rebound. Topical corticosteroids administered between a few times daily to hourly are usually sufficient for achieving quiescence with anterior uveitis. In acute and severe cases, as well as patients with poor compliance or treatment response, periocular corticosteroids may be given.45 The risk of cataract and secondary glaucoma increases with each injection.⁶⁰ Systemic corticosteroids may be used for severe unilateral or bilateral cases that are treatment-resistant to topical therapy or secondary to systemic disease with parallel indications. An expert panel in Taiwan suggested that anterior uveitis flares become concerning when they occur more than 3 times a year and thus may require systemic immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) to decrease the burden of topical therapy.45 Finally, sustained-release corticosteroid implants may be considered in severe anterior uveitis cases that are intolerant of topical corticosteroids or systemic IMT. IMT is still ideally needed in these cases because of the risks associated with long-term corticosteroid use.⁶¹

 

Topical cycloplegic agents are often used in conjunction with corticosteroids. These agents reduce photophobia and pain by relaxing ciliary body spasm. Furthermore, they release posterior synechiae and prevent their development, which also reduces the risk of angle-closure glaucoma.⁴⁵

 

Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are mainly used as an adjunct with topical corticosteroids. These agents can be helpful in reducing postoperative anterior uveitis and uveitic cystoid macular edema. Systemic NSAIDs are generally not used in the primary treatment of anterior uveitis.

 

In general, IMT can be considered in cases of anterior uveitis that have a severe or sight-threatening course; respond poorly or are refractory to corticosteroids (i.e., require more than 2 drops per day of topical prednisolone 1% acetate to achieve inflammatory control); or develop severe IOP elevation in response to topical corticosteroids. IMT is also indicated in cases involving systemic inflammatory disease that necessitate systemic treatment, such as HLA-B27 associated spondyloarthritis (Table 2).⁴⁵ ⁵⁸ ⁶² Indications for IMT should be balanced with behavioural (e.g., noncompliance), systemic (e.g., liver disease), and reproductive (e.g., pregnancy) risks.⁶² Classes of IMT include antimetabolites, biologics (e.g., tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, anti-interleukin agents, anti-CD20), inhibitors of T-lymphocyte signaling and alkylating agents.⁴⁵ ⁶² Antimetabolites such as methotrexate (ocular dosing 20-25 mg/week) are typically used as a first-line agent, followed by adalimumab as a first-line biologic. Ophthalmologists should feel comfortable co-managing these cases with a rheumatologist and directing them with appropriate ocular dosing. Thorough baseline investigations and routine bloodwork done every 3 months are required while taking these medications.

Table 2. Indications to initiate systemic IMT for noninfectious anterior uveitis⁴⁵ ⁵⁸ ⁶²

  • Active (>5 cell/hpf) despite very frequent (q1h) and prolonged course of topical corticosteroids

  • Inactive uveitis but requiring frequent topical steroid use to maintain quiescence (>bid of topical prednisolone 1%)

  • Severe steroid responder limiting topical steroid use to adequately control uveitis

  • Multisystem inflammatory disease that requires systemic IMT; e.g., active ankylosing spondylitis and uveitis

hpf, high-powered field; IMT, immunomodulatory therapy

IMT typically elicits a therapeutic response within 3 months of treatment initiation, during which an immunosuppressive bridge should be used. Strong indicators of therapeutic response include visual acuity and severity of ocular inflammation.1 If the treatment effect is inadequate at the maximum tolerated dose it is always helpful to reassess your diagnosis and reconsider the history, review of systems, and physical examination. Address the potential for nonadherence to medication. If none of these factors are contributory, the activity is likely due to inadequate therapy and the IMT should be escalated with an agent from a different class. On the other hand, if an IMT regimen has achieved corticosteroid-free remission, dosing should be kept constant for at least 2 years before attempting a taper.⁵⁸

 

Surgical intervention is usually reserved for uveitis-related complications, mainly glaucoma and cataract. Uncontrolled glaucoma requiring surgical intervention may require therapeutic options, including gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy, insertion of drainage devices such as Ahmed glaucoma valves, or trabeculectomy. Early referral to a glaucoma specialist is crucial and glaucoma surgery should be performed ideally after more than 3 months of uveitis quiescence to reduce postoperative complications.58 Similarly, cataract surgery should be performed once uveitis is stable. In cases of neovascularization of the iris or trabecular meshwork angle, vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors can be injected off-label.⁶³⁻⁶⁴

 

For infectious anterior uveitis, management comprises a combination of local corticosteroid therapy and systemic antimicrobial therapy that targets the causative pathogen. Periocular corticosteroid administration should generally be avoided in infectious uveitis. When a specific infectious etiology is strongly suspected, it is reasonable to administer prophylactic antimicrobial therapy before diagnostic confirmation.⁶⁵

 

Conclusion

Anterior uveitis is the most common anatomical form of uveitis and can lead to sight-threatening sequelae if it is not properly managed. Due to the multitude of potential presentations and etiologies, characterization of the disease requires a thorough review of symptoms and a multisystem examination. Diagnostic workup is crucial for treatment and should follow a tailored, stepwise approach that is guided by medical history, clinical findings, and regional epidemiology. Investigations that are obtained in the absence of clinical orientation are often of limited utility and incur significant costs to patients and the healthcare system. Most cases of anatomically isolated anterior uveitis will resolve with topical corticosteroids and cycloplegic agents, but some etiologies require escalation of therapy to include topical NSAIDs and systemic IMT. Visual prognosis hinges on targeted treatment. Further population-based studies with rigorous methodology are needed to elucidate the epidemiology of anterior uveitis in Canada.

 

References

  1. Jabs DA, Nussenblatt RB, Rosenbaum JT, Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Working Group. Standardization of uveitis nomenclature for reporting clinical data. Results of the First International Workshop. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140(3):509-516.

  2. Miserocchi E, Modorati G, Mosconi P, Colucci A, Bandello F. Quality of life in patients with uveitis on chronic systemic immunosuppressive treatment. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2010;18(4):297-304.

  3. Haasnoot AMJW, Sint Jago NFM, Tekstra J, de Boer JH. Impact of uveitis on quality of life in adult patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2017;69(12):1895-1902.

  4. Krishna U, Ajanaku D, Denniston AK, Gkika T. Uveitis: a sight-threatening disease which can impact all systems. Postgrad Med J. 2017;93(1106):766-773.

  5. Jalil A, Yin K, Coyle L, Harper R, Jones NP. Vision-related quality of life and employment status in patients with uveitis of working age: a prospective study. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2012;20(4):262-265.

  6. Tomkins-Netzer O, Talat L, Bar A, et al. Long-term clinical outcome and causes of vision loss in patients with uveitis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(12):2387-2392.

  7. Harthan JS, Opitz DL, Fromstein SR, Morettin CE. Diagnosis and treatment of anterior uveitis: optometric management. Clin Optom (Auckl). 2016;8:23-35.

  8. Relvas LJ, Caspers L, Chee SP, Zierhut M, Willermain F. Differential diagnosis of viral-induced anterior uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2018;26(5):726-731.

  9. Hwang DK, Hung JH, Chang YC, et al. Step-wise diagnostic approach for patients with uveitis - Experts consensus in Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2022;55(4):573-580.

  10. Sève P, Cacoub P, Bodaghi B, et al. Uveitis: diagnostic work-up. A literature review and recommendations from an expert committee. Autoimmun Rev. 2017;16(12):1254-1264.

  11. Durrani OM, Tehrani NN, Marr JE, Moradi P, Stavrou P, Murray PI. Degree, duration, and causes of visual loss in uveitis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(9):1159-1162.

  12. Rothova A, Suttorp-van Schulten MS, Frits Treffers W, Kijlstra A. Causes and frequency of blindness in patients with intraocular inflammatory disease. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80(4):332-336.

  13. Williams GJ, Brannan S, Forrester JV, et al. The prevalence of sight-threatening uveitis in Scotland. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(1):33-36.

  14. Chang JHM, Wakefield D. Uveitis: a global perspective. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2002;10(4):263-279.

  15. Wakefield D, Chang JH. Epidemiology of uveitis. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2005;45(2):1-13.

  16. García-Aparicio Á, García de Yébenes MJ, Otón T, Muñoz-Fernández S. Prevalence and incidence of uveitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2021;28(6):461-468.

  17. Dandona L, Dandona R, John RK, McCarty CA, Rao GN. Population based assessment of uveitis in an urban population in southern India. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84(7):706-709.

  18. Joltikov KA, Lobo-Chan AM. Epidemiology and risk factors in non-infectious uveitis: a systematic review. Front Med. 2021;8:695904.

  19. Thorne JE, Suhler E, Skup M, et al. Prevalence of noninfectious uveitis in the United States: a claims-based analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(11):1237-1245.

  20. Suhler EB, Lloyd MJ, Choi D, Rosenbaum JT, Austin DF. Incidence and prevalence of uveitis in Veterans Affairs Medical Centers of the Pacific Northwest. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(6):890-896.e8.

  21. Reddy AK, Patnaik JL, Miller DC, Lynch AM, Palestine AG, Pantcheva MB. Risk factors associated with persistent anterior uveitis after cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;206:82-86.

  22. Hasler P, Zouali M. Immune receptor signaling, aging, and autoimmunity. Cell Immunol. 2005;233(2):102-108.

  23. Moulton VR. Sex hormones in acquired immunity and autoimmune disease. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2279.

  24. Gritz DC, Wong IG. Incidence and prevalence of uveitis in Northern California; the Northern California Epidemiology of Uveitis Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(3):491-500; discussion 500.

  25. Gao F, Zhao C, Cheng G, et al. Clinical patterns of uveitis in a tertiary center in North China. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2017;25(sup1):S1-S7.

  26. Reddy AK, John FT, Justin GA, Dahr SS. Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease in a Native American population in Oklahoma. Int Ophthalmol. 2021;41(3):915-922.

  27. Yuen BG, Tham VM, Browne EN, et al. Association between smoking and uveitis: results from the Pacific Ocular Inflammation Study. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(6):1257-1261.

  28. Lin P, Loh AR, Margolis TP, Acharya NR. Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for uveitis. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(3):585-590.

  29. Roesel M, Ruttig A, Schumacher C, Heinz C, Heiligenhaus A. Smoking complicates the course of non-infectious uveitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249(6):903-907.

  30. Costa E, Almeida D, Cerqueira M, Costa JR, Ribeiro AR, Sousa-Neves J. Smoking as associated factor for spondyloarthritis related uveitis: results from a single centre cross-sectional study. Acta Reumatol Port. 2020;45(4):265-269.

  31. Grotting LA, Davoudi S, Palenzuela D, Papaliodis GN, Sobrin L. Association of low vitamin D levels with noninfectious anterior uveitis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135(2):150-153.

  32. Llop SM, Davoudi S, Stanwyck LK, et al. Association of low vitamin D levels with noninfectious uveitis and scleritis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2019;27(4):602-609.

  33. Sobrin L, Stanwyck LK, Pan W, Hubbard RA, Kempen JH, VanderBeek BL. Association of hypovitaminosis D with increased risk of uveitis in a large health care claims database. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018;136(5):548-552.

  34. Chiam NPY, Hall AJH, Stawell RJ, Busija L, Lim LLP. The course of uveitis in pregnancy and postpartum. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(10):1284-1288.

  35. Chen WD, Yang YH, Lee CY, Lai CH, Liu CY, Lai LJ. Pre-eclampsia/eclampsia as a risk factor of noninfectious uveitis among postdelivery women. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;198:166-173.

  36. BenEzra D, Cohen E, Maftzir G. Uveitis in children and adolescents. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89(4):444-448.

  37. Wong A, McKelvie J, Slight C, Sims J. Land of the long white cloud: the spectrum of uveitis at a tertiary referral center in New Zealand. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2017;25(sup1):S115-S121.

  38. Shirahama S, Kaburaki T, Nakahara H, et al. Epidemiology of uveitis (2013-2015) and changes in the patterns of uveitis (2004-2015) in the central Tokyo area: a retrospective study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18(1):189.

  39. Chan SM, Gan KD, Weis E. Characteristics and predictors of recurrence of anterior and intermediate uveitis in a Canadian referral centre. Can J Ophthalmol. 2010;45(2):144-148.

  40. Felfeli T, Christakis PG, Bakshi NK, Mandelcorn ED, Kohly RP, Derzko-Dzulynsky LA. Referral characteristics and wait times for uveitis consultation at academic tertiary care centres in Toronto. Can J Ophthalmol. 2018;53(6):639-645.

  41. Venkatesh P, Gogia V, Shah B, Gupta S, Sagar P, Garg S. Patterns of uveitis at the Apex Institute for Eye Care in India: results from a prospectively enrolled patient data base (2011-2013). Int Ophthalmol. 2016;36(3):365-372.

  42. Keino H, Nakashima C, Watanabe T, et al. Frequency and clinical features of intraocular inflammation in Tokyo. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2009;37(6):595-601.

  43. Tan WJ, Poh EW, Wong PY, Ho SL, Lim WK, Teoh SC. Trends in patterns of anterior uveitis in a tertiary institution in Singapore. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2013;21(4):270-275.

  44. Tesavibul N, Boonsopon S, Choopong P, Tanterdtham S. Uveitis in Siriraj Hospital: pattern differences between immune-related uveitis and infectious uveitis in a university-based tertiary care hospital. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;38(2):673-678.

  45. Chao YJ, Hung JH, Lin CP, et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of noninfectious acute anterior uveitis with or without human Leukocyte Antigen B27 in Adults - Expert Consensus in Taiwan. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. Published online January 26, 2023:1-8.

  46. Wu X, Tao M, Zhu L, Zhang T, Zhang M. Pathogenesis and current therapies for non-infectious uveitis. Clin Exp Med. Published online November 24, 2022. doi:10.1007/s10238-022-00954-6

  47. Gueudry J, Muraine M. Anterior uveitis. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2018;41(1):e11-e21.

  48. Gutteridge IF, Hall AJ. Acute anterior uveitis in primary care. Clin Exp Optom. 2007;90(2):70-82.

  49. de Parisot A, Kodjikian L, Errera MH, et al. Randomized controlled trial evaluating a standardized strategy for uveitis etiologic diagnosis (ULISSE). Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;178:176-185.

  50. Grumet P, Kodjikian L, de Parisot A, et al. Contribution of diagnostic tests for the etiological assessment of uveitis, data from the ULISSE study (Uveitis: Clinical and medicoeconomic evaluation of a standardized strategy of the etiological diagnosis). Autoimmun Rev. 2018;17(4):331-343.

  51. Noble J, Hollands H, Forooghian F, et al. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of anterior uveitis investigation by Canadian ophthalmologists. Can J Ophthalmol. 2008;43(6):652-657.

  52. Forooghian F, Gupta R, Wong DT, Derzko-Dzulynsky L. Anterior uveitis investigation by Canadian ophthalmologists: insights from the Canadian National Uveitis Survey. Can J Ophthalmol. 2006;41(5):576-583.

  53. Lin P. Infectious uveitis. Curr Ophthalmol Rep. 2015;3(3):170-183.

  54. Amaro D, Carreño E, Steeples LR, Oliveira-Ramos F, Marques-Neves C, Leal I. Tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis (TINU) syndrome: a review. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(6):742-747.

  55. de Parisot A, Jamilloux Y, Kodjikian L, et al. Evaluating the cost-consequence of a standardized strategy for the etiological diagnosis of uveitis (ULISSE study). PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0228918.

  56. Jamilloux Y, Kodjikian L, Broussolle C, Sève P. Sarcoidosis and uveitis. Autoimmun Rev. 2014;13(8):840-849.

  57. Rahmi A, Deshayes E, Maucort-Boulch D, et al. Intraocular sarcoidosis: association of clinical characteristics of uveitis with findings from 18F-labelled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(1):99-103.

  58. Foster CS, Kothari S, Anesi SD, et al. The Ocular Immunology and Uveitis Foundation preferred practice patterns of uveitis management. Surv Ophthalmol. 2016;61(1):1-17.

  59. Gregory AC 2nd, Kempen JH, Daniel E, et al. Risk factors for loss of visual acuity among patients with uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the Systemic Immunosuppressive Therapy for Eye Diseases Study. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(1):186-192.

  60. Reichle ML. Complications of intravitreal steroid injections. Optometry. 2005;76(8):450-460.

  61. Friedman DS, Holbrook JT, Ansari H, et al. Risk of elevated intraocular pressure and glaucoma in patients with uveitis: results of the multicenter uveitis steroid treatment trial. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(8):1571-1579.

  62. Dick AD, Rosenbaum JT, Al-Dhibi HA, et al. Guidance on noncorticosteroid systemic immunomodulatory therapy in noninfectious uveitis: Fundamentals Of Care for UveitiS (FOCUS) Initiative. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(5):757-773.

  63. Cervantes-Castañeda RA, Giuliari GP, Gallagher MJ, et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab in refractory uveitic macular edema: one-year follow-up. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009;19(4):622-629.

  64. Mackensen F, Heinz C, Becker MD, Heiligenhaus A. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) as a treatment for refractory macular edema in patients with uveitis: a pilot study. Retina. 2008;28(1):41-45.

  65. Zandi S, Bodaghi B, Garweg JG. Review for Disease of the Year: treatment of viral anterior uveitis: a perspective. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2018;26(7):1135-1142.

Mr. Xie is a medical student, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario. Dr. Kaplan is a Lecturer, Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, and a Staff Ophthalmologist, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario.

Financial Disclosures: Mr. Xie and Dr. Kaplan have stated that they have no disclosures to report in association with the contents of this issue.

Ophthalmology Rounds is made possible through educational funding
from the following industry co-sponsors:

Partner: Biogen

Supporters: AbbVie, Apellis, Bayer, Roche, Teva

bottom of page